We were originally introduced to John by his accountant a few years ago, when we worked with him to introduce an Auto Enrolment compliant workplace pension scheme and Group Death in Service (life assurance) scheme for his workforce. We had also discussed business protection measures such as Keyman Insurance to ensure that the business would have been able to continue in the event of the death of a critical individual.
Now, John had recently sold his small but successful engineering business, and needed a long-term financial strategy for his retirement. We attended a joint meeting with John at the accountant’s office, where we were able to fully understand the details of issues such as Entrepreneurial Relief and Capital Gains Tax and quantify the net proceeds that John would receive. Although John had not been overly keen on pensions during his ownership, one thing he had done many years ago was place his business premises into a Self-Invested Personal Pension (SIPP), and the SIPP had grown with the value of rental payments over the years. The property had grown in value over the years and was not subject to CGT on sale as it was within a SIPP.
So, when formulating a plan for how John would fund his retirement, we were faced with both a substantial capital value and a sizeable pension fund. Having identified the income requirement for John and his wife, the challenge was to structure this most tax-efficiently across the different tax regimes.
Estate planning was also important to John and his wife, as they wanted their three children to ultimately benefit as much as possible from a legacy once they had both passed away. Given the value of their estate, it was significant that the children could also be nominated as potential beneficiaries of John’s SIPP. This created the potential for them to inherit the pension fund in pension form, rather than it being paid out as capital and being subject to tax in the event of death after 75. The radical changes to the tax treatment of death benefits now means that in some cases it is more suitable to draw on a pension fund later than non-pension capital, whereas the reverse was previously true.
John is adjusting to the psychological gear change of retirement and we enjoy catching up with him at our six monthly meetings.
We meet Ian face-to-face twice-yearly to review both recent performance and his needs going forwards. We are also often in touch between these times by phone or email as Ian has online access to his drawdown plan, and as a ‘hands on’ individual is keen to run thoughts by us, which we welcome.
Trusted by our clients
Trust is our foundation. We're committed to transparency, ensuring you feel secure and informed every step of the way. Your financial confidence is our priority.
Guided jargon free advice
Our advice is straightforward and jargon-free, making financial decisions easier for you. Navigate your financial journey with confidence.
Professional Service
We pride ourselves on delivering professional service of the highest standard. Our expert team is dedicated to excellence, ensuring tailored solutions that meet your unique financial needs.
Our team is ready to discuss your financial goals
Backhouse Independent Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Firm Reference Number: 126319. https://register.fca.org.uk For further information on our costs and services, please contact us.
The information and guidance contained within the website is subject to the UK Regulatory Regime and is therefore primarily targeted at customers in the UK.
Oakmount House 9 Carrside Lomeshaye
Business Park Nelson, Lancashire BB9 6RX
Telephone:
Email:
Monday - Friday: 9:00 am to 5:00 pm
© Backhouse Independent Financial Services Limited.
Registered in England.: Company No. 01140032.